Chargeback Management · · 5 min read

Why Pagos Isn’t Enough for Multi-MID Merchants

Why Pagos Isn’t Enough for Multi-MID Merchants

In today’s rapidly evolving e-commerce landscape, merchants are becoming increasingly sophisticated in how they manage and optimize their payment stacks. For those operating across multiple merchant identification numbers (MIDs), managing payments isn’t just about viewing metrics—it’s about actively orchestrating, routing, and optimizing them in real time.

Yet, despite this complexity, some tools on the market, like Pagos, offer a narrowly scoped solution: pureplay payment metrics. These tools provide dashboards, visualizations, and analytics layers over your payment data, but stop short of offering any direct control over the flows they measure. This kind of unbundled analytics product might look attractive at first glance—but when you scratch beneath the surface, it becomes clear that for multi-MID merchants, it simply doesn't make sense.

Let’s unpack why.

The Illusion of Insight: When Metrics Exist in a Vacuum

Pagos and other similar pureplay metrics platforms market themselves as providing deep visibility into payment performance - chargeback rates, approval rates, decline codes, and so on. That’s all well and good, and yes, insight is important.

But here’s the problem: insight without action is not strategy.

What happens when your data tells you that approval rates are lower for one processor versus another? Or that a specific decline code is skyrocketing in one region? If you’re using a tool like Pagos, all you can do is look at the dashboard—and maybe send an email to your payment service provider (PSP) or scramble to reroute traffic manually via some other tool.

There’s no native way to respond to the insight in real-time. That’s the limitation of unbundled metrics: they offer context, but no mechanism to execute.

The Cost of Convenience: When Basic Features Come at a Premium

Pagos doesn’t just fall short on action—it also asks you to pay extra for what should be table stakes. Case in point: access to Verifi Order Insights, a core component of chargeback and dispute management. While this tool is essential for resolving disputes efficiently and reducing fraud-related losses, Pagos puts it behind a paywall.

Contrast that with platforms like Chargeblast, which offer the same capability completely free—and do so as part of a broader, orchestration-friendly toolkit. This isn't just a question of cost—it's a question of alignment. Tools like Chargeblast are designed to integrate seamlessly into your payment stack, helping you take action faster with no added friction.

With Pagos, you’re paying more to get less—shelling out for basic visibility, then scrambling to operationalize it elsewhere. It’s the cost of convenience without the actual convenience.

Merchants With Multiple MIDs Need More Than Metrics

Operating with multiple MIDs is a signal that a merchant has scale, complexity, and geographic or vertical diversification. These merchants don’t just need to see their payment data—they need to act on it:

A pure metrics tool like Pagos is fundamentally incapable of supporting these needs. That’s not what it was built to do.

Unbundled Metrics vs. Bundled Orchestration

What Pagos has effectively done is unbundle one single feature - analytics - from the broader category of payment orchestration. It’s akin to offering a speedometer as a standalone product, rather than as part of a working car. Sure, it tells you how fast you’re going—but it doesn’t help you steer, accelerate, or brake.

In contrast, modern payment orchestration platforms like OpenPay (and others such as Spreedly, Primer.io, or Gr4vy) provide a fully integrated suite of tools, where metrics are just one part of a much more powerful value proposition.

These platforms:

This is what real orchestration looks like. It’s not just viewing data - it’s harnessing it to drive business outcomes.

The False Economy of Buying Metrics Alone

On the surface, buying a metrics platform like Pagos may seem cost-effective. But let’s consider what it actually costs you in lost agility and opportunity:

You end up either paying to integrate Pagos into your actual orchestration toolset—or worse, you manually bridge the gap. Neither option is scalable.

Bundled orchestration platforms like OpenPay, by contrast, offer a cohesive, centralized solution. You get data, insight, and execution in one place—without the overhead of maintaining separate tools that don’t talk to each other.

Final Thoughts: Choose Tools That Let You Do, Not Just See

If your organization is operating with multiple MIDs, you’ve already outgrown simple analytics dashboards. You need a platform that doesn’t just show you problems, but solves them in real time.

Pureplay metrics tools like Pagos may serve a niche role for smaller merchants or those with simpler needs. But for sophisticated, multi-MID operations, they fall short. The future of payments is not just visibility—it’s actionable orchestration.

And to top it off, Pagos hides their pricing behind sales calls and contracts, making it hard to evaluate cost-effectiveness upfront. Contrast that with services like OpenPay and Chargeblast, which offer transparent, publicly available pricing and no long-term lock-in. With Pagos, you’re paying more to do less—and committing to it blindly. With modern platforms, you pay only for what drives value, and you know exactly what you're getting from day one.

Pagos gives you the speedometer. OpenPay gives you the whole car.

So ask yourself: Do you want to watch your payments... or drive them?

Disclosure & Disclaimer:

This blog post represents the views and opinions of the author(s) and/or the publishing organization and is intended for informational and comparative purposes only. The content reflects a critical perspective based on market observations, product comparisons, and publicly available information as of the date of publication. It is not intended to be a definitive statement about the capabilities, value, or suitability of any particular product or service.

We acknowledge that we may have a commercial relationship or competitive position with some of the companies mentioned. As such, readers should be aware of potential bias in our analysis and conclusions.

All product names, trademarks, and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners. Mention of these does not imply any affiliation with or endorsement by them.

Readers are encouraged to conduct their own due diligence before making any purchasing or platform decisions. This post does not constitute legal, financial, or business advice.

Read next